Preference Sensitive Care and Shared-decision Making in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Scoping Review.

STUDY DESIGN: Scoping Review. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to conduct a scoping review exploring the extent to which preference sensitivity has been studied in treatment decisions for LSS, utilizing shared decision making (SDM) as a proxy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Preference-sensitive care involves situations where multiple treatment options exist with significant tradeoffs in cost, outcome, recovery time, and quality of life. Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) has gained research focus as a preference-sensitive care scenario. METHODS: A scoping review protocol in accordance with PRISMA-ScR regulations was registered with the Open Science Framework (ID: 9ewup) and conducted across multiple databases from January 2000 to October 2022. Study selection and characterization were performed by three independent reviewers and an unbiased moderator. RESULTS: The search resulted in the inclusion of 16 studies varying in design and sample size, with most published between 2016 and 2021. The studies examined variables related to SDM, patient preferences, surgeon preferences, and decision aids. The outcomes assessed included treatment choice, patient satisfaction, and patient understanding. Several studies reported that SDM influenced treatment choice and patient satisfaction, while the impact on patient understanding was less clear. Decision aids were used in some studies to facilitate SDM. CONCLUSION: The scoping review identified a gap in comprehensive studies analyzing the preference sensitivity of treatment for LSS and the role of decision aids. Further research is needed to better understand the impact of patient preferences on treatment decisions and the effectiveness of decision aids in LSS care. This review provides a foundation for future research in preference-sensitive care and SDM in the context of lumbar stenosis treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Scoping Review.

Current and Expanded Indications for Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Beyond the FDA IDE Studies.

The widespread success of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has led to an interest in expanding indications beyond those outlined in the initial Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption studies. Some of these off-label indications currently include 3-level and 4-level CDA, hybrid constructs with adjacent segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or corpectomy constructs, pre-existing kyphosis, revision of a failed anterior cervical discectomy and fusion to a CDA, CDA in the setting of significant degenerative disc disease and/or facet joint arthropathy, CDA for congenital cervical stenosis, and CDA in the presence of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. This review article will summarize the current literature pertaining to the aforementioned indications.

Advances in Synthetic Grafts in Spinal Fusion Surgery.

Degenerative spine disease is increasing in prevalence as the global population ages, indicating a need for targeted therapies and continued innovations. While autograft and allograft have historically demonstrated robust results in spine fusion surgery, they have significant limitations and associated complications such as infection, donor site morbidity and pain, and neurovascular injury. Synthetic grafts may provide similar success while mitigating negative outcomes. A narrative literature review was performed to review available synthetic materials that aim to optimize spinal fusion. The authors specifically address the evolution of synthetics and comment on future trends. Novel synthetic materials currently in use include ceramics, synthetic polymers and peptides, bioactive glasses, and peptide amphiphiles, and the authors focus on their success in both human and animal models, physical properties, advantages, and disadvantages. Advantages include properties of osteoinduction, osteoconduction, and osteogenesis, whereas disadvantages encompass a lack of these properties or growth factor-induced complications. Typically, the use of synthetic materials results in fewer complications and lower costs. While the development and tuning of synthetic materials are ongoing, there are many beneficial alternatives to autografts and allografts with promising fusion results.

AOA Critical Issues Symposium: Shaping the Impact of Artificial Intelligence within Orthopaedic Surgery.

ABSTRACT: Artificial intelligence (AI) is a broad term that is widely used but inconsistently understood. It refers to the ability of any machine to exhibit human-like intelligence by making decisions, solving problems, or learning from experience. With its ability to rapidly process large amounts of information, AI has already transformed many industries such as entertainment, transportation, and communications through consumer-facing products and business-to-business applications. Given its potential, AI is also anticipated to impact the practice of medicine and the delivery of health care. Interest in AI-based techniques has grown rapidly within the orthopaedic community, resulting in an increasing number of publications on this topic. Topics of interest have ranged from the use of AI for imaging interpretation to AI-based techniques for predicting postoperative outcomes.The highly technical and data-driven nature of orthopaedic surgery creates the potential for AI, and its subdisciplines machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), to fundamentally transform our understanding of musculoskeletal care. However, AI-based techniques are not well known to most orthopaedic surgeons, nor are they taught with the same level of insight and critical thinking as traditional statistical methodology. With a clear understanding of the science behind AI-based techniques, orthopaedic surgeons will be able to identify the potential pitfalls of the application of AI to musculoskeletal health. Additionally, with increased understanding of AI, surgeons and their patients may have more trust in the results of AI-based analytics, thereby expanding the potential use of AI in clinical care and amplifying the impact it could have in improving quality and value. The purpose of this American Orthopaedic Association (AOA) symposium was to facilitate understanding and development of AI and AI-based techniques within orthopaedic surgery by defining common terminology related to AI, demonstrating the existing clinical utility of AI, and presenting future applications of AI in surgical care.

Patient and Surgeon Perceptions Regarding Microdiscectomy Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Social Media Posts.

BACKGROUND: Social media offers a powerful and expanding platform for sharing the patient experience with a large audience through an unsolicited perspective. The content may influence future perceptions around surgical care. OBJECTIVE: To analyze publicly available content on a major social media outlet related to microdiscectomy surgery based on perspective, location, timing, content, tone, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: A query of content was performed for the study period 1 January 2019 to 1 January 2021. Relevant content was identified by hashtag "#microdiscectomy." The initial query returned 10,050 publicly available posts, and the 1500 most "liked" posts were included for evaluation. Content was subsequently classified, characterized, and analyzed. RESULTS: Patients created 72.9% of microdiscectomy-related content, and spine surgeons created 23.5%. Regarding region, 77.0% of posts originated in the United States. The majority portrayed the patient experience in the postoperative phase of care (86.0%), with the primary reference to activities of daily living (56.9%). Only 1.7% of posts depicted the surgical incision site. The connotation of posts was deemed positive in 78.5% of cases. Of the posts referencing satisfaction, 98.3% depicted patient satisfaction with the surgical outcome. Patient posts in the postoperative phase of care (>1 week after surgery) were more than 2 times as likely to express positive tone (OR = 2.07, P ≤ 0.013) with their clinical course compared with patient posts outside the postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Overall, social media posts are written in a positive tone, express satisfaction with surgical outcome, typically occur in the postoperative period of care, and depict activities of daily living. These popular mechanisms of communication, such as Instagram, offer spine surgeons unique insights into the true patient experience and may provide an opportunity for surgeons to assess patient feedback, influence patient perceptions, and enhance delivery of lumbar spine care.

Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms to Predict Postoperative Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study from a multisite academic medical center. OBJECTIVE: To construct, evaluate, and interpret a series of machine learning models to predict outcomes related to inpatient health care resource utilization for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Reducing postoperative health care utilization is an important goal for improving the delivery of surgical care and serves as a metric for quality assessment. Recent data has shown marked hospital resource utilization after ACDF surgery, including readmissions, and ED visits. The burden of postoperative health care use presents a potential application of machine learning techniques, which may be capable of accurately identifying at-risk patients using patient-specific predictors. METHODS: Patients 18-88 years old who underwent ACDF from 2011 to 2021 at a multisite academic center and had preoperative lab values within 3 months of surgery were included. Outcomes analyzed included 90-day readmissions, postoperative length of stay, and nonhome discharge. Four machine learning models-Extreme Gradient Boosted Trees, Balanced Random Forest, Elastic-Net Penalized Logistic Regression, and a Neural Network-were trained and evaluated through the Area Under the Curve estimates. Feature importance scores were computed for the highest-performing model per outcome through model-specific metrics. RESULTS: A total of 1026 cases were included in the analysis cohort. All machine learning models were predictive for outcomes of interest, with the Random Forest algorithm consistently demonstrating the strongest average area under the curve performance, with a peak performance of 0.84 for nonhome discharge. Important features varied per outcome, though age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification >2, and medical comorbidities were highly weighted in the studied outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning models were successfully applied and predictive of postoperative health utilization after ACDF. Deployment of these tools can assist clinicians in determining high-risk patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Does Facet Distraction Affect Patient Outcomes After ACDF?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine if there is a correlation between the amount of facet distraction and postoperative patient-reported outcomes after ACDF. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing 1 to 3 level ACDF for degenerative pathologies at a single academic center was performed. Each patient received upright, lateral cervical spine x-rays at the immediate postoperative time point from which interfacet distance (facet distraction) was measured. Patient-reported outcome measures including NDI, PCS-12, MCS-12, VAS Neck, and VAS Arm pain scores were obtained preoperatively and at short-term (<3 months) and long-term (>1 year) follow-up. Receiver operating curves were generated to evaluate the possibility of a critical interfacet distraction distance. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to compare outcomes between groups based on the degree of facet distraction. RESULTS: A total of 229 patients met the inclusion criteria. Receiver operating curves failed to yield a critical interfacet distraction distance associated with worse post-operative outcomes. Patients were instead grouped based on facet distraction distance below and above the third quartile (0.8mm-2.0 mm, 2.0mm-3.7 mm), with 173 and 56 patients in each respective group. Univariate analysis did not detect any statistically significant differences in outcome measures, recovery ratio, or % MCID achievement at short- and long-term follow-up between groups. Multivariate analysis also failed to demonstrate any significant differences between the facet distraction groups. CONCLUSION: Increased interfacet distance did not correlate with increased neck pain or disability after an ACDF.

Social Media Posts Pertaining to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) Surgery: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Patient and Surgeon Perceptions.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze publicly available content on a major social media outlet related to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery based on perspective, location, timing, content, tone, and patient satisfaction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Social media offers a powerful platform for sharing the patient experience with the public through an unfiltered perspective. Social media content may influence future perceptions around surgical care and postings around ACDF have not been previously reported. METHODS: A query of content from a major social media outlet was performed for the study period January 1, 2018, to January 1, 2020, and returned 6500 publicly available posts. Content was identified by the hashtags "#acdf" or "#acdfsurgery." Content was ranked by number of "likes." Of the 1500 most popular posts, 1136 related to ACDF surgery and were included. Post content was characterized and classified. RESULTS: Patients created 85% of ACDF-related content and spine surgeons created 11.8%. Most posts portrayed the patient experience in the postoperative period and depicted patients performing activities of daily living, participating in sports, or completing work activities (54.4%). The connotation of posts was deemed to be positive in 79.2% of cases. In regard to their care or state of health as it related to ACDF surgery, 59.8% of patients expressed satisfaction, whereas 14.1% expressed dissatisfaction. Female patients were >4 times as likely to express dissatisfaction (odds ratio=4.16, P =<0.0001), with their clinical course compared with their male counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Patients were the source of most posts on a major social media outlet that pertained to ACDF surgery with a majority reporting positive tone and satisfaction. These mechanisms of communication offer surgeons unique insights into patient experience and may provide an opportunity for surgeons to assess patient feedback, influence patient perceptions, and enhance delivery of cervical spine care.

The Role of Preoperative Vitamin D in Spine Surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Vitamin D is an essential micronutrient for human bone health and maintenance. Patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery with hypovitaminosis D may be at greater risk for worsened clinical outcomes. This narrative review aims to compile the current literature studying the effects of low preoperative vitamin D on spine surgery outcomes, creating a resource that clinicians can use to inform their practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Vitamin D deficiency predisposes to worse outcomes following spine surgery. Vitamin D supplementation may be beneficial in reducing the risk for adverse postoperative events; however, the literature is inconclusive regarding its efficacy in improving bone density and fracture risk. Spine clinicians should be aware of the increased risk for poor outcomes in patients with preoperative vitamin D deficiency. Future investigations are needed to better evaluate the benefits of preoperative vitamin D screening and supplementation on improving surgical outcomes in spine patients. These studies must also consider the effects on perioperative healthcare costs.

The Effect of Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome on Spine Surgery Outcomes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diabetes and metabolic syndrome are highly prevalent in patients undergoing spine surgery. This review aims to capture both the findings of recently published literature investigating the effects of diabetes and metabolic syndrome on spine surgery outcomes and the current best practices in patient management. RECENT FINDINGS: Diabetes and metabolic syndrome both contribute to worse outcomes in patients undergoing spine surgery. Although patients with diabetes are at greater risk of complications, those with uncontrolled diabetes experience increased healthcare costs and greater odds of postoperative complications. Furthermore, metabolic syndrome is repeatedly shown to have an adverse effect on spine surgery outcomes, including healthcare costs and medical complications. Spine surgeons should coordinate care with primary care physicians to optimize the preoperative profile of patients with comorbidities like diabetes and metabolic syndrome to minimize operative risk. With the shift to value-based care, understanding the patient factors that lead to complications is becoming increasingly important. Future studies should build upon the current literature and design preoperative interventions for at-risk patients. Additionally, further research is needed to analyze the modulatory effects of the social determinants of health in patients with diabetes and metabolic syndrome.

Hypothyroidism and Spine Surgery: a Review of Current Findings.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hypothyroidism is a common medical comorbidity and has been linked to adverse surgical outcomes. However, its effect on spine surgery outcomes is less clear. The aim of this review is to compile current literature to serve as a guide for spine surgeons when treating patients with hypothyroidism. RECENT FINDINGS: In both the cervical and lumbar spine, patients with hypothyroidism are at increased risk of postoperative medical complications. Consequently, patients with hypothyroidism experience increased healthcare costs and readmission rates. However, there are some contradictory findings with some studies suggesting that hypothyroidism may have a protective effect in patients undergoing lumbar fusion, specifically against postoperative myocardial infraction and decreased inpatient mortality. When examining spine surgery outcomes, there are mixed results when considering the effect of hypothyroidism. Some studies have shown increased medical complications, hardware failure, and increased expenditure; however, other recent findings suggest possible protective effects. Future studies are needed to help create concrete guidelines for treating patients with hypothyroidism.

Impact of Social Determinants of Health in Spine Surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Social determinants of health (SDH) are factors that affect patient health outcomes outside the hospital. SDH are "conditions in the environments where people are born, live, learn, work, play, worship, and age that affect a wide range of health, functioning, and quality-of-life outcomes and risks." Current literature has shown SDH affecting patient reported outcomes in various specialties; however, there is a dearth in research relating spine surgery with SDH. The aim of this review article is to identify connections between SDH and post-operative outcomes in spine surgery. These are important, yet understudied predictors that can impact health outcomes and affect health equity. RECENT FINDINGS: Few studies have shown associations between SDH pillars (environment, race, healthcare, economic, and education) and spine surgery outcomes. The most notable relationships demonstrate increased disability, return to work time, and pain with lower income, education, environmental locations, healthcare status and/or provider. Despite these findings, there remains a significant lack of understanding between SDH and spine surgery. Our manuscript reviews the available literature comparing SDH with various spine conditions and surgeries. We organized our findings into the following narrative themes: 1) education, 2) geography, 3) race, 4) healthcare access, and 5) economics.

Predictive Analysis of Healthcare Resource Utilization after Elective Spine Surgery.

Introduction: The management of degenerative spine pathology continues to be a significant source of costs to the US healthcare system. Besides surgery, utilization of healthcare resources after spine surgery drives costs. The responsibility of managing costs is gradually shifting to patients and providers. Patient-centered predictors of healthcare utilization after elective spine surgery may identify targets for cost reduction and value creation. Therefore, our study aims to quantify patterns of healthcare utilization and identify risk factors that predict high healthcare utilization after elective spine surgery. Methods: A total of 623 patients who underwent elective spine surgery at a tertiary academic medical center by one of three fellowship-trained orthopedic spine surgeons between 2013 and 2018 were identified in this retrospective cohort study. Healthcare utilization was quantified including advanced spine imaging, emergency and urgent care visits, hospital readmission, reoperation, PT/OT referrals, opioid prescriptions, epidural steroid injections, and pain management referrals. Patient variables, namely, the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification system, were assessed as potential predictors for healthcare utilization. Results: Among all patients, a wide range of health utilization was identified. Age, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and American Society of Anesthesiology class were identified as positive predictors of postoperative healthcare utilization including emergency department visits, spine imaging studies, opioid and nerve blocker prescriptions, inpatient rehabilitation, any referrals, and pain management referrals. Conclusions: Markers of patient health-such as CCI and ASA class-may be used to predict healthcare utilization following elective spine surgery. Identifying at-risk patients and addressing these challenges prior to surgery is an important step to deliver efficient postoperative care. Level of Evidence: 3.

The Drivers of Persistent Opioid Use and Its Impact on Healthcare Utilization After Elective Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for persistent opioid use after elective cervical and lumbar spine procedures and to quantify postoperative healthcare utilization in this patient population. METHODS: Patients were retrospectively identified who underwent elective spine surgery for either cervical or lumbar degenerative pathology between November 1, 2013, and September 30, 2018, at a single academic center. Patients were split into 2 cohorts, including patients with and without opioid use at 180-days postoperatively. Baseline patient demographics, underlying comorbidities, surgical variables, and preoperative/postoperative opioid use were assessed. Health resource utilization metrics within 1 year postoperatively (ie, imaging studies, emergency and urgent care visits, hospital readmissions, opioid prescriptions, etc.) were compared between these 2 groups. RESULTS: 583 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 16.6% had opioid persistence after surgery. Opioid persistence was associated with ASA score ≥3 (P = .004), diabetes (P = .019), class I obesity (P = .012), and an opioid prescription in the 60 days prior to surgery (P = .006). Independent risk factors for opioid persistence assessed via multivariate regression included multi-level lumbar fusion (RR = 2.957), cervical central stenosis (RR = 2.761), and pre-operative opioid use (RR = 2.668). Opioid persistence was associated with higher rates of health care utilization, including more radiographs (P < .001), computed tomography (CT) scans (.007), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies (P = .014), emergency department (ED) visits (.009), pain medicine referrals (P < .001), and spinal injections (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid persistence is associated with higher rates of health care utilization within 1 year after elective spine surgery.

The Impact of Upper Cervical Spine Alignment on Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which the upper cervical spine compensates for malalignment in the subaxial cervical spine, and how changes in upper cervical spine sagittal alignment affect patient-reported outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous research has investigated the relationship between clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters in the subaxial cervical spine following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, limited research exists regarding the upper cervical spine (occiput to C2), which accounts for up to 40% of neck movement and has been hypothesized to compensate for subaxial dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing ACDF for cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy at a single center with minimum 1-year follow-up were included. Radiographic parameters including cervical sagittal vertical axis, C0 angle, C1 inclination angle, C2 slope, Occiput-C1 angle (Oc-C1 degrees), Oc-C2 degrees, Oc-C7 degrees, C1-C2 degrees, C1-C7 degrees, and C2-C7 degrees cervical lordosis (CL) were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively. Delta (Δ) values were calculated by subtracting preoperative values from postoperative values. Correlation analysis as well as multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine relationships between radiographic and clinical outcomes. Alpha was set at 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 264 patients were included (mean follow-up 20 mo). C2 slope significantly decreased for patients after surgery (Δ=-0.8, P =0.02), as did parameters of regional cervical lordosis (Oc-C7 degrees, C1-C7 degrees, and C2-C7 degrees; P <0.001, <0.001, and 0.01, respectively). Weak to moderate associations were observed between postoperative CL and C1 inclination ( r =-0.24, P <0.001), Oc-C1 degrees ( r =0.59, P <0.001), and C1-C2 degrees ( r =-0.23, P <0.001). Increased preoperative C1-C2 degrees and Oc-C2 degrees inversely correlated with preoperative SF-12 Mental Composite Score (MCS-12) scores ( r =-0.16, P =0.01 and r =-0.13, P =0.04). Cervical sagittal vertical axis was found to have weak but significant associations with Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS-12) ( r =-0.13, P =0.03) and MCS-12 ( r =0.12, P =0.05). CONCLUSION: No clinically significant relationship between upper cervical and subaxial cervical alignment was detected for patients undergoing ACDF for neurological symptoms. Upper cervical spine alignment was not found to be a significant predictor of patient-reported outcomes after ACDF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Do Inflammatory Cytokines Affect Patient Outcomes After ACDF?

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the relationship between serum inflammatory mediators, preoperative cervical spine disease severity, and clinical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Given the role of the inflammatory cascade in spinal degenerative disease, it has been hypothesized that inflammatory markers may serve as a predictor of patient outcomes after surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients over age 18 who underwent ACDF for cervical spondylosis with associated radiculopathy and/or myelopathy between 2015 and 2017 from a single institution were prospectively recruited. Preoperative serum inflammatory markers including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α, high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1), and white blood cells were measured and correlated to patient demographics, surgical characteristics, duration of symptoms, previous opioid use, and preoperative and 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) including the neck disability index (NDI), visual analog scale neck pain, visual analog scale arm pain, and Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form-12 (PCS and MCS, respectively) using spearman's rho coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients were enrolled with follow-up PROMs available for 62% (n=48) of patients at a minimum of 1-year after ACDF. The absolute concentrations of IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α were found to be weakly correlated with one another (ρ=0.479). Preoperative symptoms lasting <1-year were weakly correlated with elevation in HMGB1 (ρ=0.421). All other patient demographics exhibited negligible correlation with the preoperative inflammatory markers. Lower preoperative PCS (ρ=0.355) and higher preoperative NDI (ρ=0.336) were weakly correlated with elevated HMGB1. Lower MCS (ρ=0.395) and higher NDI (ρ=0.317) preoperatively were weakly correlated with elevated white blood cells. Postoperative improvement in MCS (ρ=0.306) and MCS recovery ratio (ρ=0.321) exhibited a weakly positive correlation with IL-6. CONCLUSION: Preoperative cytokine levels demonstrated minimal correlation with preoperative symptoms or clinical improvement, suggesting that profiling of patient cytokines has limited utility in predicting outcomes after ACDF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

How Do Patients With Predominant Neck Pain Improve After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Radiculopathy?

BACKGROUND: The presence of predominant pain in the arm vs the neck as a predictor of postoperative outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been seldom reported; therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with predominant neck pain improve after surgery compared to patients with predominant arm pain or those with mixed symptoms in patients undergoing ACDF for radiculopathy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent ACDF at a single center from 2016 to 2018. Patients were split into groups based on preoperative neck and arm pain scores: neck (N) pain dominant group (visual analog scale [VAS] neck ≥ VAS arm by 1.0 point); neutral group (VAS neck < VAS arm by 1.0 point); or arm (A) pain dominant group (VAS arm ≥ VAS neck by 1.0 point), using a threshold difference of 1.0 point. Subsequently, individuals were substratified into 2 groups based on the arm to neck pain ratio (ANR): non-arm pain dominant defined as ANR ≤1.0 and arm pain dominant (APD) defined as ANR >1.0. Patient-reported outcome measurements including Neck Disability Index (NDI), Physical Component Score-12, and Mental Component Score (MCS-12) were compared between groups. RESULTS: No significant differences between groups when stratifying patients using a threshold difference of 1.0 point. When stratifying patients using the ANR, those in the APD group had significantly higher postoperative MCS-12 (P = 0.008) and NDI (P = 0.011) scores. In addition, the APD group showed a greater magnitude of improvement for MCS-12 and NDI scores (P = 0.043 and P = 0.038, respectively). Multiple linear regression showed that the A and the APD groups were both independent predictors of improvement in NDI. CONCLUSION: Patients with dominant arm pain showed significantly greater improvement in terms of MCS-12 and NDI scores compared to patients with dominant neck pain. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To compare the impact of ACDF on arm and neck pain in the context of cervical radiculopathy using patient-reported outcome measures as an objective measurement.

Stability in Direct Lateral vs Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Context of Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) may increase the risk of dislocation in patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA), especially when the LSF was done before the THA. Most publications evaluated patients who had undergone THA using a posterior approach to the hip, yet there are little data on the influence of other surgical approaches. The goal of this study was to evaluate the risk of THA dislocation with anterior supine-based surgical approaches to the hip in patients who have undergone surgical management of concurrent hip and spine pathology. METHODS: Patients older than 18 years who underwent an LSF and THA using a supine approach-either direct anterior (DA) or direct lateral (DL)-between 2000 and 2018 were identified. Only standard bearings (28-32-36-40 mm) were used. The dislocation rate was determined in this cohort. A subsequent analysis was conducted, stratifying patients based on the order in which they received the LSF or THA. RESULTS: A total of 582 surgical hip-spine patients were retrospectively identified and included in the cohort. Of total, 332 patients (57.0%) received an LSF before the THA; 250 (43.0%) had the fusion after a primary hip replacement. There were 143 patients (24.6%) in the DA group and 439 (75.4%) in the DL group. Overall, there were five dislocations (0.9%) in the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with simultaneous degenerative hip and lumbar spine pathology, anterior supine-based approaches demonstrate a low (<1%) risk of instability. Given the small number of total dislocation events (n = 5), additional analysis is warranted to assess the effect of different anterior approaches (DA versus DL) or timing of lumbar spinal surgery (before or after THA). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Analyzing the Impact of Cannabinoids on the Treatment of Spinal Disorders.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cannabis is among the most used illicit substances globally, with medical applications, increased legalization, and shifting social attitudes leading to increased use in recent years. Cannabinoids are a group of psychoactive substances found within the cannabis plant, with the most common being Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol. Due to the high prevalence of use, it is increasingly important to evaluate the effects of cannabis and cannabinoids on spine patients, in both operative and nonoperative settings. RECENT FINDINGS: Cannabis and cannabinoids may be effective in treating patients with chronic conditions such as back pain and spinal cord injuries. Longitudinal effects and implications on surgical outcomes and complications are poorly understood. High-quality, outcomes-focused research can inform approaches for clinicians to approach cannabis and cannabinoid use. Studies to elucidate the standardization of cannabis regimens can help develop guidelines for potential therapeutic applications. Cannabis and cannabinoids may be useful alternatives or additions for many spine patients, but future research is needed for recommendations to be determined. Our manuscript reviews the available literature regarding cannabis use and various spinal conditions, organizing our findings into the following narrative themes: (1) the management of chronic lower back pain, (2) perioperative outcomes, (3) cannabis use in general orthopaedic procedures, and (4) spinal cord injuries.

A Surgeon's Guide to Understanding Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Studies in Orthopaedic Surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In recent years, machine learning techniques have been increasingly utilized across medicine, impacting the practice and delivery of healthcare. The data-driven nature of orthopaedic surgery presents many targets for improvement through the use of artificial intelligence, which is reflected in the increasing number of publications in the medical literature. However, the unique methodologies utilized in AI studies can present a barrier to its widespread acceptance and use in orthopaedics. The purpose of our review is to provide a tool that can be used by practitioners to better understand and ultimately leverage AI studies. RECENT FINDINGS: The increasing interest in machine learning across medicine is reflected in a greater utilization of AI in recent medical literature. The process of designing machine learning studies includes study design, model choice, data collection/handling, model development, training, testing, and interpretation. Recent studies leveraging ML in orthopaedics provide useful examples for future research endeavors. This manuscript intends to create a guide discussing the use of machine learning and artificial intelligence in orthopaedic surgery research. Our review outlines the process of creating a machine learning algorithm and discusses the different model types, utilizing examples from recent orthopaedic literature to illustrate the techniques involved.